Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Water

America's Got Water Problems, and No Plan to Fix Them

By Elizabeth de la Vega, Tomdispatch.com. Posted July 23, 2008.


The lives and income of millions have been upended by government mismanagement of water issues.
Advertisement

"Lisa, the whole reason we have elected officials is so we don't have to think all the time. Just like that rainforest scare a few years back. Our officials saw there was a problem and they fixed it, didn't they?" -- Homer Simpson

On June 24, 2008, Louie and I curled up on the couch to watch seven of the nation's foremost water resources experts testify before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee's Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

This was a new experience for us. For my part, the issue to be addressed -- "Comprehensive Watershed Management Planning" -- was certainly a change of pace from the subjects I ordinarily follow in Judiciary and Intelligence Committee hearings. I wasn't even entirely sure what a "watershed" was. I knew that, in a metaphorical sense, the word referred to a turning point, but I was a bit fuzzy about its meaning in the world of hydrology. (It's the term used to describe "all land and water areas that drain toward a river or lake.")

What was strange from Louie's point of view was not the topic of the day, but that we were stuck in the house. Usually at that hour, we'd be working in the backyard, where he can better leverage his skill set, which includes chasing squirrels, digging up tomato plants, eating wicker patio chairs, etc. On this particular afternoon, however, the typically cornflower-blue San Jose sky was the color of wet cement, and thick soot was charging down from the nearby Santa Cruz Mountains. Sitting outside would have been about as pleasant as relaxing in a large ashtray.

It would have been difficult, on such a day, not to think about water.

June 24, 2008: Water on the Brain

In California, of course, it was the lack thereof. Thanks to the driest spring on record in many areas -- including in San Jose, where recordkeeping began in 1875 -- the whole state was parched. Far worse, large chunks of it were burning. To be precise, on June 24th, there were 842 wildfires blazing, the result of "dry lightning," which -- I've now learned -- happens when conditions are so dry that the rain never makes it to the plain. It evaporates in mid-air.

In the Midwest, on the other hand, water was everywhere, cascading across the land and through towns; or, it was threatening to do so, as terrified homeowners and volunteers desperately hoisted sandbags onto levees that were failing, due to forces as powerful as the mighty Mississippi and as seemingly innocuous as burrowing muskrats. The flooding had been ongoing for weeks, killing dozens of people, displacing thousands, and causing billions of dollars of crop, building, and other damage. With California burning and Iowa underwater, the Red Cross national disaster relief fund for 2008 was already entirely depleted, although six months of potential weather devastation of various sorts still lie ahead. The balance, its finance director had announced, was "zero."

Meanwhile, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Weekly News was reporting that the deluge had swept record amounts of storm-water into lakes and rivers, "bringing along pollutants from urban streets, farm fields and construction sites." To make matters worse, as of late June, Wisconsin communities had already identified 164 "overflow events" -- a polite term for the release of untreated sewage into the state's waters.

Where were all these chemicals and all that muck ultimately headed? Some of it would be spewed into the Great Lakes, already beset by a host of problems. To name a few: slimy Eurasian water milfoil that clogs boat propellers, fish viruses, chemicals that cause glandular disturbances (think: intersex fish), Asian carp that eat everything in sight, zebra mussels by the trillions, and -- not to be forgotten -- lots and lots of chicken manure. (This is a huge and serious issue, but I can't resist mentioning that it was the topic of the recent Great Lakes Manure Handling Expo, which you may have missed.)


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water policy, u.s. government

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor with over twenty years experience. A contributor to TomDispatch since 2005, her pieces have appeared in various publications including the Nation, the Christian Science Monitor, the Los Angeles Times, Salon.com, Truthout, Common Dreams and the Public Record. The author of United States v. George W. Bush et al., she may be contacted at elizabethdelavega@verizon.net or through Speakers Clearinghouse.

Copyright 2008 Elizabeth de la Vega

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Water! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yeah!
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Jul 23, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watershed, food shortages and pricing, gasoline gouging, healthcare disgrace, home-lending corruption, homelessness, outsourcing, unemployment, crimes against humanity, national bankruptcy, lies, deceit, fear-mongering, election tampering and fraud, FISA, corrupt judiciary, feckless Congress, felon-laden White House.....I can go on. Watershed? Yeah, but to hell with committees and cspan.....we need the public in every affected locale to rise and seize power and it damned sure does not begin in any court in America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» gasoline gouging Posted by: toddcory
Water Water Everywhere!
Posted by: Cathy on Jul 23, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come to Michigan if you need water. No, we are not going to send you our water, but come here and live among the Great Lakes. A pact has recently been signed by all Great Lakes governors and Canada to keep our water here. No one asked folks to move to the desert. (Sorry, but it's true.)

We have water and plenty of skilled workers.

Come on! The waters just fine!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Water Water Everywhere! Posted by: roncypert
» RE: Water Water Everywhere! Posted by: Lloyd Drako
Mexitli promises
Posted by: Mexitli on Jul 23, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to do his share to conserve water and drink more BEER.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mexitli promises Posted by: JoshuaR
» That's funny Posted by: Mexitli
water wars
Posted by: sirios on Jul 23, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we think the oil wars are frightening, just wait for the water wars to get into full swing. It probably will never reach international status because we will have long since destroyed ourselves domestically. Over population and ignorance is a deadly combination. the mechanics of fixing the problem are the same, find more oil and water and continue the same ignorant misuse of resources. Well, good luck, because we have a finite amount of resources and presently less than finite amount of intelligence. Pity, because humans have at their disposal an almost infinite untapped resevoir of potential.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» water wars Posted by: Lloyd Drako
» RE: water wars Posted by: sirios
we can't afford coordination
Posted by: sophiej on Jul 23, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of water resources. That would mean acknowledging the decades of pandering to agribusiness and land developers, especially in the West. Does any rational person really think California's dry Central Valley is suitable for growing rice?
Great piece!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hmmm
Posted by: trewqwert on Jul 23, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read that the 20th century was unusually wet in the western US, according to tree ring data.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are about to be sold a bill ....
Posted by: stellabloo on Jul 23, 2008 11:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... of goods :(

The new word in water utilities will be privatization. It will sound great at the time: companies eager to foot the bill for infrastructure improvements in return for modest metered water rates.

Until the improvements fail to go in and the water rates soar .... There is no money to be made in privatized water utilities - why they are originally PUBLIC utilities - UNLESS every known corner can be cut until the end-user falls over bleeding (from h. pylori probably).

Of course, our respective governments will fall all over themselves in the sacred name of NAFTA to make sure that all the unneccessary scrutiny gets cut with the red tape.

Caveat emptor :(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michgan's water problems; like the rest of the country
Posted by: Raymonde on Jul 23, 2008 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article mentions in passing the areas with lots of local water supplies have tremendous water management problems. That is true; the article’s main point needs to be underlined:
The nation as a whole has neglected, abused, covered over, destroyed, polluted and almost destroyed our rivers, lakes, ponds and wetlands during the past 275 years; that policy of abuse is continuing today.

In Michigan, the major feature of destruction involve road building techniques that pave over, wetlands, bury streams and creeks, divert those into storm sewers and then allow the excess runoff to be passed into the nearest large natural sink. In S.E Michigan, that happens to be Lake St. Clair; so on one northern end of the lake, sewage, (often untreated) is dumped into the lake (which is relatively shallow)and drinking water is drawn off the southern edge, not twenty miles away. However, this horrible, sickening situation is not unique to Michigan, it is one with a packaged thinking which views water as another commodity that is derived from a factory system.

What can be done?

Do not assume water is part of your future-it may well not be. Some of my neighbors, ( I live in an apartment complex) have toilet facilities that do not shut off all the time. They flush, then walk away, leaving the water to run for 8-10 hours. The manager is clueless when this is pointed out.
Everywhere, I see huge amounts of water misused; sprinklers run in the middle of rain storms, car washes flush hundreds of cubic feet of dirty water into the storm sewers hourly and the local streams and rivers serve as open runoff sewers for the paved areas nearby. We as a society are continuing to allow leadership to mismanage one of our most important resources. A healthy human can live for many weeks without food supplies, the same human will die a terrible death of dehydration in 72 hours if deprived of any water source.

We can take back the sources of water, Water Management 101 would begin by all of us finding out all we can about all of the local streams, and trace every drop of water that we use, from the time it first enters the ecosystem to the moment it passes our lives and what happens over the next months as that water traverses across the landscape.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The elephant in the room . . .
Posted by: dustdevil on Jul 24, 2008 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is, of course, overpopulation.

So far our totally worthless and mostly criminal politicians are not addressing this issue. They will undoubtably wait until the problem becomes so serious that draconian measures will be required in order to maintain any quality of life.

I have an idea of where to start.

The governments of every country should offer free vacectomies to every man and even pay them to go through the procedure.

A similar offer could be made to women but I think the procedures required would be more complicated. Vacectomies are simple and only
take minutes to perform.

Overpopulation is the main cause of global warming. It is also the driving force behind most of the world problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]